PURPOSE:To investigate whether allopurinol exerts a protective effect on kidneys by measuring new kidney injury biomarkers (NGALp, NGALu, KIM 1 and IL 18) and analysing the renal function and histology in uninephrectomised rats subjected to ischaemia-reperfusion injury.METHODS: Thirty two Wistar rats were randomly allocated to four groups: Sham (S): laparotomy; Control (C): laparotomy and ischaemia-reperfusion in the left kidney; Control Allopurinol (CA): laparotomy and allopurinol at a dose of 100mg·kg1·d 1; and Allopurinol (A): laparotomy ischaemia-reperfusion in the left kidney and allopurinol at a dose of 100mg·kg 1·d1. The NGALp, NGALu, KIM 1, IL 18 and creatinine levels and the kidney histology were analysed. The significance level was established as p<0.05.RESULTS:Creatinine level increased in all the groups, with A ≈ C > S ≈ CA. The NGALp, NGALu and IL 18 levels exhibited similar behaviour in all the groups. KIM 1 was higher in group A than C and showed intermediate values in groups S and CA. Severity of injury in the left kidney was greater in groups C and A compared to S and CA.CONCLUSION:Allopurinol did not exert protective or damaging effects on the kidneys of rats subjected to ischaemia-reperfusion injury.

OBJETIVO: Analisar a influência de dissecções coronarianas não complicadas na incidência de revascularização do vaso alvo e eventos cardiovasculares maiores, em um ano. MÉTODO: Pacientes tratados de junho/1996 a dezembro/2000, sendo os dados coletados, prospectivamente, e comparadas dissecções não complicadas (G1, n=36) às sem dissecções (G2, n=871). Os dados foram analisados com programa estatístico SPSS 8,0, os desfechos comparados com curvas de Kaplan-Meier e o nível de significância avaliado pelo teste do log rank. RESULTADOS: As características clínicas foram semelhantes nos dois grupos: O G1 apresentou diâmetro de referência médio menor (p<0,0001), mais pacientes com lesões tipo C (p=0,01), menores diâmetros luminais ao final do procedimento (p=0,003) e maiores relações balão/artéria (p<0,0001). Por análise multivariada, somente diâmetro de referência e relação balão-artéria foram independentemente associados à presença de dissecções residuais. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa nas incidências de revascularização do vaso alvo e eventos cardiovasculares maiores, no seguimento clínico em um ano, entre os grupos de pacientes com ou sem dissecções. Os preditores de eventos clínicos adversos em um ano foram diâmetro de referência, extensão da lesão e estenose residual, mas não a presença de dissecção residual. CONCLUSÃO: Dissecções residuais não complicadas após o implante de "stents" coronarianos estão associadas a artérias de menor calibre e maiores relações balão/artéria, mas não com piores desfechos no seguimento clínico em um ano.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of uncomplicated coronary dissections in the incidence of target vessel revascularization and cardiovascular events after 1 year. METHODS: Patients treated from June 1996 to December 2000, with data prospectively collected and uncomplicated dissections (G1, n=36), were compared with those patients without dissections (G2, n=871). Data were assessed with SPSS 8.0 statistical software, the outcomes were compared with the Kaplan-Meier curve, and the significance level was assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Clinical features were similar in both groups: G1 had lower mean reference diameters (P<0.0001), a greater number of patients with type C lesions (P=0.01), a lower final lumen diameter at the end of the procedure (P=0.003), and a greater balloon/artery ratio (P<0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, only the reference diameter and the artery/balloon ratio were independently associated with the presence of residual dissections. No statistically significant difference existed in the incidence of revascularization of the target vessel and major cardiovascular events, at 1-year clinical follow-up, between the 2 groups of patients. Predictors of adverse clinical events at 1 year were the reference diameter, lesion extension, and residual stenosis, rather than the presence of residual dissection. CONCLUSION: Uncomplicated residual dissections after coronary stents are associated with narrower vessels and a higher balloon/artery ratio. Residual dissections are not associated with worse outcomes at 1-year clinical follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive factors of complications after implantation of coronary stents in a consecutive cohort study. METHODS: Clinical and angiographic characteristics related to the procedure were analyzed, and the incidence of major cardiovascular complications (myocardial infarction, urgent surgery, new angioplasty, death) in the in-hospital phase were recorded. Data were stored in an Access database and analyzed by using the SPSS 6.0 statistical program and a stepwise backwards multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: One thousand eighteen (mean age of 61±11 years, 29% females) patients underwent 1,070 stent implantations. The rate of angiographic success was 96.8%, the rate of clinical success was 91%, and the incidence of major cardiovascular complications was 7.9%. The variables independently associated with major cardiovascular complications, with their respective odds ratio (OR) were: rescue stent, OR = 5.1 (2.7-9.6); filamentary stent, OR = 4.5 (2.2-9.1); first-generation tubular stent, OR = 2.4 (1.2-4.6); multiple stents, OR = 3 (1.6-5.6); complexity of the lesion, OR = 2.4 (1.1-5.1); thrombus, OR = 2 (1.1-3.5). CONCLUSION: The results stress the importance of angiographic variables and techniques in the risk of complications and draw attention to the influence of the stent's design on the result of the procedure.